Tag Archives: Microsoft

Breaking Windows Will Cost Consumers and IT Industry Nearly $30 Billion

30 industry executives and noted economist say “remedies” will be disruptive and expensive

WASHINGTON, D.C. – Consumers will pay the price of a $30 billion increase in software costs if some critics have their way and split Microsoft into multiple companies or force the company to license its code, according to a study released today. Both proposals, suggested as remedies in the Microsoft antitrust trial, would create multiple versions of the Windows operating system, fracturing a popular product many consumers have chosen to run their personal computers.

Stan Liebowitz, Professor of Managerial Economics and Associate Dean of the University of Texas at Dallas, authored the study, which examines just one of the consumer costs of breaking up Windows.

“In the first three years alone, increased software costs will mount to nearly $30 billion,” Dr. Liebowitz announced today. “This cost is particularly expensive and disruptive when you consider the lack of consumer benefit to these types of remedies.”

“The enormous costs we’ve shown, which are only one part of the story, are in no way balanced by potential benefit,” Dr. Liebowitz said. “While this study focuses on software development, we know that additional costs would be incurred by OEMs, resellers, trainers and corporate IT companies. In addition to higher prices, consumers will also pay with having fewer choices and greater confusion.”

In reaching the conclusions, the author examined independent reports on PC software company costs, industry forecasts of software sales on the Windows desktop platforms, and personal interviews with software companies.

The study was released in Washington, DC today in connection with a day of Congressional meetings planned for member companies of the Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) and The ASCII Group, Inc. ACT is the fastest-growing industry trade association; ASCII is the world’s largest group of computer resellers. Company executives met with more than thirty Congressional offices to discuss regulation in the IT sector and the impact these remedies would have on their businesses. Mostly small- and medium-sized, the companies included computer resellers, software developers, trainers, Internet companies and IT consultants.

“The companies represented here begin to tell the story of how decisions in Washington affect IT businesses across the country,” said ACT President Jonathan Zuck. “We’re going to see significant costs of breaking-up Windows, but we’ve yet to see how it will benefit consumers.”

ACT is an industry trade association representing businesses and professionals in computer software and hardware development, and consulting and Internet services businesses. Protecting the freedom to achieve, compete and innovate, ACT is dedicated to preserving the role of technology companies in shaping the future of the industry.

Competitive Technology Urges Department of Justice Not to Pursue a Microsoft Breakup

WASHINGTON, D.C. – In a letter to Assistant Attorney General Joel I. Klein today, Association for Competitive Technology (ACT) President Jonathan Zuck urged him to reconsider any extreme interventions into the IT industry.

ACT’s letter came as a response to news reports today that revealed that the Department of Justice may be about to spend hundreds of thousands of dollars on an analysis that details how to break up Microsoft, despite overwhelming opposition from the IT industry and the public. While the reports show that the Department approached at least two technology investment banks, they also note that neither firm agreed to do the study because of the business community’s opinion that sees the DOJ’s action as interventionist.

“These firms’ reluctance to participate in this intervention is telling,” Mr. Zuck said in the letter. “It is likely that the only companies who would support such an endeavor are those that stand to gain handsome financial rewards from a Microsoft breakup.”

ACT has followed closely the Department of Justice’s case against Microsoft and found that radical measures, such as dismantling the company, are not only unprecedented but would bring extreme harm to consumers, the IT industry and the U.S. economy.  ACT’s legal analysis, economic study, and industry survey noted several key findings:

Extreme measures are legally unjustified. An analysis by noted antitrust authorities revealed no legal precedent for a breakup and that it would lead to ongoing regulation of the U.S. tech industry. 

Divestiture is bad for the industry and bad for consumers. An economic analysis showed that consumers will pay the price of a $30 billion increase in software costs if Microsoft is split into multiple companies or is forced to license its code.

IT executives do not support extreme measures. An independent industry survey shows that IT executives overwhelmingly oppose (63 percent) a Microsoft breakup. 

“With this evidence already available, it is baffling to me why the Department of Justice would be eager to spend hundreds of thousands more dollars on this case on what boils down to a fool’s errand,” Mr. Zuck said.  “Even without this kind of in-depth analysis, it is clear that the costs of such an extreme intervention into today’s dynamic technology industry would outweigh any potential benefit.  I urge the DOJ to allow the IT industry to continue on its path of service and value to the American consumer,” he added.

Competitive Technology is an industry trade association representing businesses and professionals in computer software and hardware development, and consulting and Internet services businesses. Protecting the freedom to achieve, compete and innovate, ACT is dedicated to preserving the role of technology companies in shaping the future of the industry.

Competitive Technology Files Friend of the Court Brief in the Microsoft Antitrust Case

ACT Files Friend of the Court Brief in the Microsoft Antitrust Case

The legal brief’s bottom line: tech competition is working and the DOJ’s case is bad for consumers and the high-tech economy (see press release.)

Following Judge Jackson’s invitation for the parties in the suit to each designate an amicus to file a “friend of the Court” brief, ACT petitioned Microsoft to be their amicus on behalf of the IT industry.  Microsoft designated ACT, and the IT trade association then worked with the renowned law firm Wilmer, Cutler & Pickering to compose the brief.

ACT filed its brief on behalf of about 9,000 IT businesses involved in all aspects of the tech sector from software and hardware development, to technology trainers, resellers and consultants, to Internet companies.

While Microsoft is a proud member of ACT, given they are a party to the case, funds were raised specifically for the assembly of this brief from among ACT members. Among the major sponsors are: Corporate Software and Technology, Norwood, MA; Clarity Consulting, Chicago, IL; Sax Software, Eugene, OR; and ComponentSource, Atlanta, GA.